Skip to main content

EEND678 Artifact 2 -- Designing a PBL Unit

The second artifact that I chose to reflect one was the UBD assignment in which one of my PBL ideas was elaborated on and planned for. Similar to my first artifact, I chose this artifact because it challenged me in a new way. While I am familiar with the UBD construct and principle, I have never utilized that framework to plan for a unit of this nature. For this assignment, I utilized my PBL outlines to choose a project I felt could be realistically implemented in an environment where I had the ability to manipulate the curriculum purposefully. The project I chose to further develop was about school start times. I chose this because it has been a hot topic in our school over the last couple of years. This year, students have late arrival one day a week which provided a launching point to discuss the topic. When thinking about PBLs it is important for students to have an investment in what they are learning, and I felt like this topic would provide a high level of investment for my students. In addition, because they have practical connections to the topic, it seemed to be a good fit. Dr. Michael J Martirano says this is a key in how PBLs can be implemented effectively: “PBL is a main driver in making real-life, relevant and practical connections to problem solving and critical thinking experiences.”

Here is a copy of my UBD:


Some challenges in creating this assignment was figuring out how to make it standards based, interesting, and authentic. This definitely took the longest to figure out. The next hardest element was the assessments. I had to rethink about how to assess the standards through authentic design. While this was challenging, I do think I was able to navigate both of those elements. It did take time to figure out, however, I felt that it was time well spent in that not only would I be able to evaluate the standards, but students could have tangible evidence of why they are assessed on those standards through an authentic experience. A last challenge was planning activities that would guide my students, but still allow them exploration in the topic. I chose to provide them with the final summative assignment (the proposal), but I also think it would be interesting to see what they could come up with given the standards and the essential question. 

This assignment fits perfectly into implementation in the classroom. While creating this assignment took time and more long term planning than I typically do, I could definitely see the benefit in it. Utilizing this structure through the PLC process also seems like a good guide and helps determine when the essential standards will be taught and assessed. I can see this framework being an easy addition to any classroom!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Let me introduce myself...

Hi! My name is Stephanie and I am a special education teacher at Naperville North High School. I just wrapped up my fourth year at NNHS. Since I began teaching, I have taught and co-taught a variety of classes: biology, earth science, algebra 1, algebra 2 core, English 2, resource, and literacy workshop.  Prior to teaching, I attending the University of Illinois and studied psychology. While there, I was an avid participant in our student athletic board and cheered on our Illini, even though it was often hard to do. After graduating, I attend Lewis University where I received my Master's in special education, which ultimately led me to NNHS! I am married and have an 18 month old son who is always very busy! When it comes to technology, I feel pretty comfortable with digital learning. Our school is entering the third year of one to one using chromebooks. Learning with our students has been incredibly rewarding. I have been able to implement much more into my classes than I

677Y Module 8 Discussion and Course Reflection

Module 8:  When it comes to augmented and virtual reality in the classroom, I have had no experience. That being said, I have come in to contact with both elements outside of school. I use Snapchat frequently, and most of the filters are augmented reality. While I don’t have a virtual reality system, I have used them and can see the excitement over the experience. After reviewing the article “Virtual Reality vs Augmented Reality” by Augment, I think the use of augmented reality would be more easily inserted into the classroom. It seems like devices that are readily available, such as iPhones and iPads, possess the ability to enhance the classroom with augmented reality; whereas, virtual reality would require entirely different devices. The learning commons in our school has a section where students can access augmented reality. Patricia Brown speaks about this capability in her article, “How to Transform Your classroom with Augmented Reality.” She says, “There are practical example

EEND 675 Artifact 2 -- Creating a Collaborative Assignment

The second artifact I would like to reflect on involved an assignment in which we were asked to create an assignment or task students could complete by working collaboratively. This sounded easy enough to do, as students collaborate all day on work. Why this specific assignment stood out to me, is that I really had to step back and think about how do I ask students to collaborate on the same piece of work using different devices in order to help the greater good? I say working for the greater good because to me, this is really the purpose of collaboration. Two heads are better than one, right? Right! As long as those two heads are working toward the same purpose. In the past, I suppose collaboration has involved students using one computer to “collaborate” on an assignment. With the effective implementation of technology, students can now easily and equally contribute on the same piece of work. Designing collaborative work does come with its challenges. It was important to think abou